seventy seven . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
The mentioned case laws offer insights into how the courts interpret and apply Section 302, emphasizing the importance of the fair and just legal system. It can be crucial for society to understand the gravity of this offense as well as the need for stringent punishment to deter possible offenders and make certain justice with the victims and their people.
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and incorporate all notable cases decided through the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
4. It goes without indicating that observations made hereinabove are merely tentative in nature and strictly confined to your disposal of quick bail petition.
Retribution: Section 302 PPC also serves the purpose of retribution, where society seeks justice for your loss of the life. It allows the legal system to impose a proportional punishment on the offender, guaranteeing they are held accountable for their actions.
Electronic and paper court records retained at the court site is usually viewed in the courthouse for free, however there is often a charge of ten cents per page to print from a public access terminal.
P.C. Liability of petitioners to the said offences would be determined from the acquired trial Court after sifting the evidentiary value of the material made before the same. Till then, case of
This public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a close-by electricity grid station due to possible health risks and hazards.
The DCFS social worker in charge with the boy’s case had the boy made a ward of DCFS, As well as in her 6-thirty day period report into the court, the worker elaborated over the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into here a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
Regardless of its popularity, not many may be aware of its intricacies. This article is definitely an attempt to highlight the flaws of this section plus the extremely small threshold that governs it.
In addition, it addresses the limitation period under Article 91 and 120 of your Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to seek cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case legislation previously rendered on similar cases.